Kashmiri Pandit's tears, can any 'humanist' answer his questions?

Now that Aung San Suu Kyi has said that her government is ready to take back Rohingya, who has left the country, did all the members of the Rohingya Fan Club wipe out her collective alligator tears and have them farewell to her? Unless it is definitely, it has not been decided that they should be enthusiastic about at least the voting banks of the Congress, the demography of those areas which should still be with the majority of Hindus and against India Prepare the army of jihadis for the war.
In a more populous country like India, where the resources are already tense, educated workers / politicians / social workers / journalists are making a case for the most important foreign countries, which were coming from miles away in our country. What is really about some people who inspire such enthusiastic and 'human' activism?

Today, 'sensitive' journalists are going to the extent of being like Rohingya with the Kashmiri Pandit community! Such comparisons have come so far and they suspect that they have been killed. Everyone knows that K.P. Over the centuries, in the hands of the majority community in Kashmir has under harassment, but once none of us has resorted to terrorism / insurgency. We have never murdered or raped anyone.
The fact of the matter is that Rohingya, such as his Kashmiri Muslim counterparts, had a religious war against the Buddhists and the Government of Myanmar.
Unfortunately for them, the Buddhists were in the majority, retaliated and changed the tables on them. So there was no innocent Rohingya under 'Genocide', there was no 'escape'. These people really set fire to the shelter and when their jihad failed; Kashmiri Pandits were pursued according to the Islamic agenda. If Rohnangians were not effectively faced by Buddhists in Myanmar, then Rakhi can be declared an Islamic state by now! These facts have been easily ignored by the Blinkard Media, which
a brave and honest Buddhist monk as a 'terrorist' rather than a patriot, and continuous propaganda is being done against them.
If Rohingya is allowed to live, then he will already pressurize the resources of the heavily burdened country, but why should his supporters take care of the people living in the gate community? Many of these Rohingy have already obtained fake base / PAN card and voter ID, which they recognize for deportation, may be a difficult task. According to the newspaper reports, fake birth certificates have been organized in Jammu and Kashmir in West Bengal while some enthusiastic NGOs have been able to provide them fake 'State subject certificates'! Which brings us to the question that in reality those noise needs to be raised in the Nissour debate, how exactly did Rohingyas manage to reach Jammu from Myanmar? Who brought them here and why? Why was there no alarm bell for the UPA Government in the presence of such a large number of foreigners in such sensitive areas in 2008?
Omar Abdullah, who was concerned about the cancellation of the suggestion of 35 A in Jammu last month, needs to tell him how he is planning to adjust non-state subjects such as Rominja. Hardliners and radical Kashmiri Muslim panelists are ready to leave Article 35 A from Takhine for their Muslim brothers? Altaf Bukhari, PDP minister says that he is standing for "all those who have lost their house", are Kashmiri Pandits included in this? Does he have the same perspective for Kashmiri Pandits. The nation wants to know!
To represent the Rohingyas, for the rising lawyers' batteries, did one of them ever offer to fight on behalf of the deprived and homeless Kashmiri Pandits? NHRC has disturbed the question of the Supreme Court's recent denial to entertain a petition on behalf of the KP community? The question is, the outsiders Rohiniya Muslims who have a lot of money after all, how did they give Congress leader Kapil Sibal, Aam Aadmi Party leader Prashant Bhushan, type big lawyers' fees, or Congress and Aam Aadmi Party Bypassing them, you must think about this topic.
If Prashant Bhushan, Colin Gonsalves and Co. was actually a 'public interest activist', they used to claim that they did not take up the issue of rehabilitation and rehabilitation of Kashmiri Pandits before participating in the courts to stop foreigners' exile Was the limitations illegal? People like Bhushan do not care about sympathy with this group of Kashmiri because they already throw them with those whose 'freedom' and 'jihad' help them to gain more eyes in any way.
Trendy socialites and page 3 tweeted in the foot, the Rohingyas have been seized as appropriate 'secular' because the Kashmiri Pandits are Hindus and hence their fight is not! The rude truth is that during these decades, during the 'Kashmir War', the Lions gang has always chosen to identify 'freedom' of Kashmiri Muslims and with 'glamorous' calls. Therefore, taking 'coodles' from 'poor' Muslim Rohingyas naturally comes to these foreign educated elitists, for which every Hindu / Indian is so desi and downmark!
If Prashant Bhushan, Colin Gonsalves and Co. was actually a 'public interest activist', they used to claim that they did not take up the issue of rehabilitation and rehabilitation of Kashmiri Pandits before participating in the courts to stop foreigners' exile Was the limitations illegal? People like Bhushan do not care about sympathy with this group of Kashmiri because they already throw them with those whose 'freedom' and 'jihad' help them to gain more eyes in any way.
Trendy socialites and page 3 tweeted in the foot, the Rohingyas have been seized as appropriate 'secular' because the Kashmiri Pandits are Hindus and hence their fight is not! The rude truth is that during these decades, during the 'Kashmir War', the Lions gang has always chosen to identify 'freedom' of Kashmiri Muslims and with 'glamorous' calls. Therefore, taking 'coodles' from 'poor' Muslim Rohingyas naturally comes to these foreign educated eliteists, for which every Hindu / Indian is so desi and downmark!
Therefore, when in a less developed country like Bangladesh, where it is actually involved in Rohingya, it is sufficiently rational that in order to monitor and control 'refugees', they roam freely across India. Bangladesh is also thinking about restricting them to different islands so that to prevent the conflict, to control the number of birth control measures, thousands of Rohini women are pregnant in India, while already 4 -5 children
Rohingyas live deliberately in the Indian system, deliberately combine with the local population and are growing at a dangerous rate. They are settled in the strategic areas of Jammu and Ladakh to tricolor demographics in areas of Hindus and Buddhists. And yet, we have 'compassionate' secular souls who save airy comparisons between these 'won' people and the neglected KP community!
Will there ever be a 'public interest activist' such as Prashant Bhushan, Kapil Sibal Colin Gonsalves, and also for the Kashmiri Pandits, will also stand for any Kashmiri Pandits like award wapasi gang will return his award for kashimiri pandit, would anybody ever say "NOT IN MY NAME" As if any protest will stand in support of the Kashmiri Pandits, will the Supreme Court of India automatically take
, whether Kashmiri Pandit like once again Sector will again live in Kashmir valley when you will stand for Kashmiri pandits, when you must stand up for this country, when you must stand up for themselves